【秦蓁】從“南方王門”到“關學”：陽明學的地區化研討——以關中南年夜吉為一包養網站比較中間

Abstract

The Confucian Case of Ming Confucianism ranks Nan Daji as “the King of the South”, and the “Regional Education” positiones Nan as “Regional Education”. The divergent positioning of the two combines the Nan’s Yangming academic nature and regional nature. The transformation of Nan Daji’s lifelong academic thoughts has a close relationship with Yangming. He used Yangming to teach “to be close friends” in Guanzhong area, and integrated Yangming with the traditional sacrificial learning, becoming the development of Yangming’s regionalization. The breakthrough of Nan’s knowledge of knowledge, the breakthrough of door-level perception, and the breakthrough of self-awareness are the breakthrough of self-transcendence in philosophical meaning. The innovative attempts of the Nan family to “become a confidant” and the discussions with Rong from my coming and going, have emerged a unique development form of regionalization in Yangming.

Keywords: Nan Daji; “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucian Case”; 同; to be close to the confidant; regionalization

The History of the Ming Dynasty wrote two parts that have a different understanding of the school positioning and thinking of Nan Daji (1487-1541): “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucian Case” and “The Encyclopedia of Relationship”. The two are very different about Nan Daji’s academic course and thinking of Nan’s academic school positioning. Huang Zongxi’s “Ming Confucian School” lists the Nan family as the “Southern King’s School”, and uses Yang Mingxue as the sect; Rong positioned the Nan family as the “Southern King’s School” from my “Southern King’s School” and uses Relevant to the school as the sect; their differences in positioning between “Southern King’s School” and “Relevant” seem to be somewhat conscientious, which is actually very meaningful. The different schools of thought express the differences in the positioning of Nan Daji: The Ming Confucian Case attempted to construct a whole Ming Confucian system, taking Yangmingxin as an important position, and plotted Nan Daji as a branch of Yangming; the “Registration” attempted to construct the science department of Guanzhong area, taking broad science as a base, and treat Nan Daji as one of the branches of Guanzhong science. That is: from the perspective of the teacher’s relationship, Nan Daji’s Yangming academic component is nothing wrong; but if we look at the history of regional sexual science, Nan Daji’s scientific contributions in the relevant science cannot be underestimated. In contrast, the cooperation between “Southern King’s Gate” and “BaoqingRelated Education” projected on Nandaji are: Yangmingxue and Guanzhong area. Although Nan Daji is not an original thinker, the intersection between spiritual and intellectual learning in the “Kingmen” is” and “relevant” have different colors in the academic development. It spreads the contribution of “to be a confidant” in academic history, its academic characteristics and energy, and cooperates with the regionalization of Yangming’s development in the relevant region, and its meaning in the perspective of thinking history and philosophical history is particularly important.

1. “Southern” and “Concentration”: The regional nature of Yangming School

Yangming School has its “regional nature” due to its inheritance and development in various regional civilization environments. The “Ming Confucian Case” used the famous Wang Xuemen School to divide the Red Seven Schools earlier, including ” The Southern King’s Gate School Case”, “Southern King’s Gate” can be divided into four branches, including the Guanzhong King’s Gate in the west of Min. 1 According to this, Nan Daji is the main focus of the “Southern King’s Gate” in the “Ming Confucian School”. Therefore, the regional nature of the development of Yangming studies is not unrelated to the Nan Daji. The historical editor of the Ming Confucian Case and the “Religious Education” has detailed analysis.

The Ming Confucian Case” positioned Nan Daji as the “Southern King’s School Case” based on the relationship between Nan’s family and Wang Yangming, and the regional nature of the teaching and learning in the Nan’s family. This positioning method and basisBao Haimei is the general classification principle of Huang’s compilation process. In fact, Nan Daji can be said to be one of the students who had major contributions during the lecture and Yang Ming period in the late Ming Dynasty. Huang Zongxi did not regard Nan Daji’s main contributions as important. The arrangement standard of the “South” is regarded as a double-first consideration. This is relatively weak and independent of Nan Daji’s implementation of Yangming’s thinking and Yangming’s group in the central region.

In the collection and adoption of academic data from various students, Huang Zongxi used the “Ming Confucian Case” as much as possible during the process of “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucianism” href=”https://twsugargirl.org/”>Baocai sweetheart website is picked from the original work, and the collection of Nanji data is “not ever collected”, because it is “what has been seen and returned”.2. The relevant Nanji data used by Huang Zongxi is different from the data used by Rong from the “Related Education” and there is no more or special raised data. The reason is that on the one hand, it is NanjiBaohuang Network VIPJi’s data is missing as Huang said, and it is no longer visible; on the other hand, the compilation of “Record Learning” was seventy years earlier than “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucian Case”. In the absence of original data, Huang should not have been able to borrow references from “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucian Case”. A piece of data published in “The Confucian Case of Ming Confucian Case” was not recorded: “There are many people who are exposed to each other and admire each other, so there are many people who are acquainted with each other. The prince and the king’s letter was very clear about his confidants. He said that after the sacred channel, he has now started from the Southern Yuan Dynasty. “3 Maybe he cannot defeat him.This proves the misunderstandings of Huang Zongxi’s personal opinion on Yangming studies in various regions, but at most it can be seen that Huang Zongxi is unwilling to say that this record is highly recognized by Zhongnan and received Yangming, and its correlation with protecting online car and horse fees between him and the study of Yinqu. In addition, Nan Daji’s related academic data should be different in the retention of Xingxing and Relationship, because Nan Daji’s relationship with Wang Yangming and Yangming was the most direct and most closely related period. After returning to the relationship, he was between Yangming and Yangming students. There are very few connections, and in addition, the comprehensive nature of the big earthquake in the 34th year of Jiajing (1555), the two sons of Nanji were born in the earthquake, and the information about the Nan family was even more difficult to understand, which became the reason why academic history records had to be briefly recorded.

Huang Zongxi positioned Yangming and distinguished more detailed school plans, focusing on the region as its reference and the right balance standard for division, such as YuBao Xue Case, King of Zhejiang Central, King of Jiangyou, King of Zhejiang East, King of Zhejiang, King of Taizhou, etc. Judging from the scope of the designated area, the “Southern” of the Southern King’s School case includes far away from other king’s doors. The Huang family listed the three provinces of Shandong, Henan and Xi of the Southern King’s School case. Compared with other kingdoms, “South” covers a wider geographic area, which is a relatively solid plan method. “The King of Southern 大官网大官网” cannot reflect the differences between various regions in the south, nor can it present the characteristics of Yangming development. Huang Zongxi’s method of holding Yangming students in Shandong, Henan and western China in the same room was actually “rigid大官网 and lacked”. 4 The Ming Confucian Case has transferred the south