requestId:6851860f1cfb78.97427416.
A exploration of the universe between worship and sensibility—Reading the eight-volume “The Collection of Essays of the Romance” by Chen Bisheng Source: Modern Philosophy, 2021, No. 6, Preparation
Abstract: In the eight-volume version of the newly released “The Collection of Essays of the Romance”, Mr. Rongda called for the evaluation of “Confucianism in the universe”. In the Chinese philosophy research, the discussion on cosmic theory is relatively thin. Especially the research on Hong Kong Taiwan, represented by Mou Zongsan, Chinese philosophy understands “the study of life and life”, and thus believes that Confucianism is like the theology of morality, and religion exists based on morality. In this understanding, the thinking that exists based on the theory of the universe like Dong Zhongshu, which is based on morality, is not the true Confucian thinking. Mr. Rong went to the cosmic theory from his reflection on modern society, and believed that China’s cosmic theory gained a balanced theory in the power of “sensibility and worship”. The cosmic theory is neither representative nor religious worship, but has settled people’s lives between the two. Moreover, Master Rong believed that there was a transformation between Qin and Han that “legislative legislation based on people” to “legislative legislation based on heaven”. Legislative legislation based on heaven is a new order of cosmic theory, and moral values can be developed from cosmic theory. Returning to the inner structure of Chinese civilization itself, cosmic theory often forms the mother topic of historical philosophy and moral philosophy. The little girl in the tribute and ritual system influenced by the cosmic theory puts her cat on the service table and wipes it one by one and asks: “The structure of a belt has further shaped the characteristics of China’s civilization.
Keywords: “The Collection of Essays of the Romance”; Cosmic theory; Sentiment; Reverence; [Time Travel/Rebirth] Red Thorn North “Hooking up with a Big Boy with Beauty” [Completed + Extra]
Author Introduction: Chen Bisheng, a Chaoyang native of Guangdong, Ph.D., professor of philosophy in the Department of Tsinghua University
The eight-volume “The Collection of Essays of the New Book” (Hebei Teachers’ Book Club, October 2020) is a Philosophy of the Chief Teacher of the Rongda Teacher The first collection of the road, which concentrates the extensive and subtle theoretical exploration of the problems of Chinese philosophy by Mr. Rong. Among them, the first four volumes “A Brief Discussion on Late Chinese Philosophy”, “A Brief Discussion on the Song and Ming dynasties”, “A Brief Discussion on Classical Philosophy of China” and “A Brief Discussion on Taoist Philosophy of China” are revisited on the old side. Although it is called “a brief discussion” and “a brief description”, it is actually a general work on the history of Chinese Philosophy; Volume 8 “A Brief Discussion on the Adventure of Chinese Philosophy” is a profound and pure work on the history of Chinese Philosophy. Introduction; In addition, Volumes 5-7 are special collections of topics, Volumes 5 “The Between the Truth” is the result of the study of Confucianism by Mr. Rong, Volumes 6 “The Infinite” spends the study of Mr. Rong, and Volumes 7 “The Road to Thinking” discusses the themes of the universe, sensibility, and sunami thoughts that Mr. Rong.
Among them, Mr. Rong, the book published by Mr. Rong was the first in 1989His book “Exploration and Confusion of Chinese Philosophy” (later renamed “A Brief Discussion on Late Chinese Philosophy”), has paid special attention to the relationship between heaven and man in the Yin and Zhou dynasties, and believes that this problem has become the starting point for the understanding of the two schools of Confucianism and Taoism. This book even wrote two philosophies, which are collectively called “the innate discussion of the two universes” [1]. After the 21st century, as Master Rong said: “The important issues in the first ten years focused on the cosmic theory of the classical metaphysics in China, and the intrinsic theory of classical metaphysics in the next ten years were doubled.” [2] The specialist theory of the universe is “Baohuang.com also discussed the evaluation questions of Confucianism in the Hantang universe, “Review of the Universe of Chinese Classical Philosophy”, “Cosmic Discussion of the Confucian System and its Changes”. It can be said that Mr. Rong, the teacher’s attention to the theory of the universe, has experienced a process from philosophical history to discussion of philosophical problems, from object-based thinking history to theoretical construction based on worry-free consciousness. The cosmic theory discussion is not only a major aspect of the philosophy research of the President and the Teacher of the Prince of the University.
1. The scientific and cosmic discussion hand left the seat and immediately rushed over. “The recording is still in progress; the competition
For a long time, the cosmic discussions in Chinese philosophy have been relatively thin, and it is even more so in the field of Confucian philosophy. Generally speaking, there are several important areas that have to be discussed in cosmic discussions. For example, in the Confucianism, Dong Zhongshu’s philosophy in the early days was a system constructed by the cosmic theory as the middle, and the Taoist Lao Tzu, Guanzi and the Chinese. Neither the age of the 陈利不 nor the Huainanzi can avoid the discussion of the universe. In addition, some discussions with specific issues cannot be separated from the sorting of the universe, such as understanding why China does not have scientific problems, the four-time and five elements problems in Chinese civilization, etc. There are two problems in these discussions. One is that it is more oriental, which leads to some problems in Chinese philosophy that can originally involve the domain of the universe being concealed; the other is that 博官网 is more modern, resulting in low evaluation of cosmic theory in Chinese traditional philosophy or relatively large errors. As Master Rong said: “The universe theory is a metaphysical structure adopted by Taoism and Confucianism in the Han Tang Dynasty. It is also widely recognized by the Chinese people so far, but since the late age, it has always been accused of being misunderstood and promoting science and promoting science. ”【3】Simplely speaking, under the standard of “science”, even the most profound cosmic structure often becomes a product that predecessors lacked emotional understanding of the natural world.
The important development of Mr. Rong’s reflection on the problem of cosmic theory is the research on philosophical studies since modern times, especially the neglect of this problem by Mou Zongsan, Li Siguang and others. Mou Zongsan emphasized Dong Zhongshu’sTheories regard the theory as the middle, which is not suitable for the energy of Confucianism. He said: “Dong Zhongshu is in the cosmic theory, which means based on the cosmic theory. He must first establish the cosmic theory before he can talk about morality. This is not a confucianism. “The Doctrine of the Mean” and “The Yi Biography” are not the way.” [4] However, Li Siguang simply believed that the Confucianism in the Han and Tang dynasties was not well-known. In the second volume of “Media” of “History of Chinese Philosophy”, he said: “From Han to the end of the Tang Dynasty, the decline of Chinese civilization’s energy and the confusion of philosophical thinking have reached an extremely amazing level. The two Han craftsmanship are claimed by later generations. However, according to the facts, Confucianism has become obsolete, and Confucianism seems to be excited but has perished. The discussions of Confucius and Mencius’ minds and morals and the moral principles of achieving virtue are all obscured. This is a great disaster in Chinese philosophy.” [5]
In fact, Mou Zongsan’s judgment on the theory of the universe comes from the construction of his philosophical system. The most basic difference between the three chapters of Mou Zong distinguishes between Chinese and Western philosophy, and is considered to be the difference between “life” and “natural”. He said: “Chinese philosophy, the important subject developed from its through hole is life, which is the study of life. It takes life as its object, and the important focus is on how to adjust our lives, to transport our lives, and tolerate our lives. This is different from those natural philosophers in Greece , their object is the eye, and nature is an important subject. ” [6] Understanding Chinese philosophy as the “study of life” is the result of philosophy in the revival of Song and Ming Philosophy and Oriental Literature and Art; while the object of research by philosophers in ancient Greek was “natural”, in order to emphasize the sensual tradition of Oriental philosophy. In this understanding, the understanding of “natural” is single-faceted into “natural”. In fact, don’t talk about the three schools of Confucianism, Taoism and Mohism in the pre-Qin, Confucianism, Taoi
